Donate...
[i-link]
Our Manifesto
Our manifesto
Who governs Britain?
EU Documents
The Lisbon Treaty
That "mandate" analysed
EU Constitution - official version
Constitution analysis
Constitution Summit analysis
Building a political Europe
Myths
The seven basic myths
Good for the environment
Co-operating nation states
Europe reunited
The EU is democratic I
The EU is democratic II
Can't be a "superstate"
Keeping the peace in Europe
A free trade area?
Constitution for enlargement?
Qanagate
Corruption of the Media
click here for contents[i-click here for contents]
Blogroll
-
5 minutes ago
-
8 minutes ago
-
23 minutes ago
-
24 minutes ago
-
43 minutes ago
-
59 minutes ago
-
1 hour ago
-
1 hour ago
-
1 hour ago
-
1 hour ago
-
2 hours ago
-
2 hours ago
-
2 hours ago
-
3 hours ago
-
3 hours ago
-
4 hours ago
-
4 hours ago
-
4 hours ago
-
8 hours ago
-
9 hours ago
-
9 hours ago
-
12 hours ago
-
16 hours ago
-
17 hours ago
-
17 hours ago
-
18 hours ago
-
21 hours ago
-
21 hours ago
-
21 hours ago
-
23 hours ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
4 days ago
-
5 days ago
-
6 days ago
-
6 days ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
2 weeks ago
-
2 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
4 weeks ago
-
4 weeks ago
-
5 weeks ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
3 months ago
-
4 months ago
-
5 months ago
-
5 months ago
-
-
Climate Change
-
3 minutes ago
-
4 minutes ago
-
5 hours ago
-
5 hours ago
-
5 hours ago
-
6 hours ago
-
8 hours ago
-
19 hours ago
-
2 days ago
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(407)
-
►
April
(29)
- We're moving home
- They keep on charging
- I have not forgotten
- Après le Dellers
- Cameron gets tough
- One of those days
- An all-time low
- This tells us precisely what?
- Why the cover-up?
- Water thieves
- Not only Greece
- An invite to the discussion?
- A dignified end
- We're not asking
- Thieves out to play
- Looters still at large
- A constitutional democracy
- Happy days
- Holding on to Boris
- Big European Brother
- A real veto
- We're sick of the lot of you
- A non-event
- Dismally led
- The burdenless burden
- The end of the Muppet show?
- A complete coincidence?
- Out to play
- Skulking in the shadows
-
►
March
(109)
- Framing the argument
- Clever old Sun
- A jolly good thing?
- Muddying the waters
- The not-so-free market
- A real rebellion
- By-bye election
- We've been busy
- Nuke plans scrapped
- Hold the front page
- The illusion of choice
- Schools 'n' hospitals reprise
- Dying the death
- The trivia rolls on
- Muddling through is awfully jolly
- Making a mockery of themselves
- The elephant in the letter box
- The Old Swan Manifesto
- A huge political mistake
- You don't say
- Why is this news?
-
►
April
(29)
-
▼
2007
(1691)
-
▼
July
(162)
- A classic non-answer
- They are all so enigmatic
- Diversionary tactics
- The acid test
- I am putting this book on my list
- The fifth column
- Own goals galore
- Irish troubles
- The "constitutional concept…" lie
- Going private
- Cynicism and modernization
- Government begins at home
- It certainly isn't going away
- The Saturday "toy"
- That's the way to do it
- It isn't going away
- Have these people no shame?
- Ratification woes
- Will he ever die?
- Time for opposition
- Why?
- A good and faithful servant
- Party funds
- Intellectually dishonest
- The £40 billion sting
- Evasion, evasion, evasion
- An avoidable death?
- Cameron on the constitution
- Comprehensive Spending Review
- Quote of the day
- Nowhere but down
- The Hague speech
- Hoist with his own petard
- Tony Blair, call your office
- Move on … nothing to see here!
- A charmed life
- EU taxes on the way
- A statement in the House
- The new treaty: a whopping 277 pages
- Turkey has the same government
- A small entertainment
- They do not appear to be happy
- Playing the "Europe" card
- Competence
- Global warning
- An example of failure
- People tend to laugh
- All too familiar
- We shall soon be losing this
- Getting it wrong
- The gamble that failed
- These foreign ministers are quarrelsome
- The Galileo of the internet
- That's it?
- Where is Giscard in this line-up?
- Target Brown
- The corruption of the Beeb
- Taking over our health services
- Go away! Just go away!
- Cartoons: four jailed
- That famous enigma
- Will he live up to it?
- The help is appreciated
- EU pays to be lobbied on global warming
- Who does he work for?
- A contradiction of policies
- That petition
- How to avoid a referendum
- Credit where it is due
- What are they trying to achieve?
- Allons enfants de l'Europe!
- What about the bigger picture?
- If you are not winning - lie
- A recipe for inflation
- Too good to be true
- The perfect EU policy
- Global warming strikes again
- Can we learn from the Russians?
- That petition
- The debate is not over
- Sins catching up?
- A mountain to climb
- Arrogance and ignorance
- Vanity first
- A new cooling?
- So, what is his status?
- Speculation, speculation, speculation
- Those cartoons again
- A mindset betrayed
- And now the fun begins
- A strong euro is a good thing - discuss
- A triumph of hope over experience
- British justice
- More on that "empire"
- The enemy within
- Education, education, education
- Swedes to make the running?
- The Empire speaks
- Stagnating in space
- More on that value-based common foreign policy
- More groundhog days
- Sits vac
- The empire's "egregious errors"
- Shock waves
- Repent … the end of the world is nigh
- It's an "Empire" – official
- We pay for this
- An election soon in Poland?
- Second take
- As Europhile as they come
- Dodgy deals
- Confederate Yankee v Associated Press
- Is political intelligence another oxymoron?
- What is Sarkozy up to?
- Subtle bias, or just bias?
- Galileo and Her Majesty's taxpayers
- It's not a constitution, but …
- A tale to cheer
- No change at the top
- Sisters under the skin
- Banging on?
- Continuing madness
- Still contributing to the gaiety of nations
- The great double deception
- Have you noticed ...
- A question of language
- A good idea turned bad
- Trying it on… again
- Still not talking Turkey
- Chipping away
- Yes, but which one, Gordon?
- "Jumping the shark"
- French logic
- The House of Ussher
- Murphy's law
- Rejoice, rejoice but ask a few questions
- A solitary voice
- What's in a word?
- OK I waited long enough
- Whom should we trust?
- Something Robert Zoellick could get his teeth into...
- The Anglosphere at war
- Gesture politics
- It can't be accidental
- Heh!
- Satire lives
- Smoked elephant?
- Wising up
- From yesterday's Evening Standard
- You cannot fool all of the people all of the time
- Futuritis
- That travel ban
- A world gone totally mad
- It is not going to fly … it is a dud system
- That other reshuffle
- You looking at us?
- Blair's EU deal not binding
- Not so innocent?
- A candidate for the Green Helmet Award?
- Let's be done with it
- Useful to know
- A message worth repeating
-
▼
July
(162)
Showing posts with label oil-for-food. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oil-for-food. Show all posts
Gallowa.01[i-Gallowa.01]As this is George Galloway we are talking about, one can argue that if his sins are catching up with him then it is not a moment too soon. Not that his punishment is going to be all that dire.
According to the Sunday Times, the man is to be suspended from the House of Commons (where he does not spend all that much time, anyway) because of his links with the oil-for-food scam.
In 1998 Galloway founded the Mariam Appeal, which campaigned for the lifting of sanctions on Iraq. The appeal, which paid Galloway’s wife and funded international travel for the MP, received almost £450,000 from Fawaz Zureikat, a Jordanian businessman who was also a trustee of the appeal. It subsequently emerged that more than half of this money came from the proceeds of Iraqi oil sales. An investigation by the American Senate alleged that the Mariam Appeal was used by the Iraqi regime to finance Galloway.Galloway continues to deny the accusations though he has not actually faced another senatorial hearing, insisting that he knew nothing about the source of the money and is being smeared. Judging by at least one comment on the article there are people out there who are ready to repeat this rubbish, adding for good measure that if British troops are withdrawn from Iraq in the next few months (not at all a given), Galloway will be proved right.
Well, no. Galloway thought Saddam was a wonderful leader and he has not been proved right on that or anything else.
Right now, he is facing a month's suspension from the House of Commons. The question is, will he still be able to claim expenses.
COMMENT THREAD