Donate...
[i-link]
Our Manifesto
Our manifesto
Who governs Britain?
EU Documents
The Lisbon Treaty
That "mandate" analysed
EU Constitution - official version
Constitution analysis
Constitution Summit analysis
Building a political Europe
Myths
The seven basic myths
Good for the environment
Co-operating nation states
Europe reunited
The EU is democratic I
The EU is democratic II
Can't be a "superstate"
Keeping the peace in Europe
A free trade area?
Constitution for enlargement?
Qanagate
Corruption of the Media
click here for contents[i-click here for contents]
Blogroll
-
15 minutes ago
-
15 minutes ago
-
16 minutes ago
-
19 minutes ago
-
20 minutes ago
-
22 minutes ago
-
29 minutes ago
-
35 minutes ago
-
53 minutes ago
-
1 hour ago
-
1 hour ago
-
2 hours ago
-
2 hours ago
-
2 hours ago
-
3 hours ago
-
3 hours ago
-
5 hours ago
-
5 hours ago
-
6 hours ago
-
7 hours ago
-
7 hours ago
-
7 hours ago
-
9 hours ago
-
16 hours ago
-
17 hours ago
-
23 hours ago
-
23 hours ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
4 days ago
-
5 days ago
-
5 days ago
-
6 days ago
-
6 days ago
-
6 days ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
2 weeks ago
-
2 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
4 weeks ago
-
4 weeks ago
-
5 weeks ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
3 months ago
-
4 months ago
-
5 months ago
-
5 months ago
-
-
Climate Change
-
7 minutes ago
-
1 hour ago
-
3 hours ago
-
5 hours ago
-
7 hours ago
-
10 hours ago
-
18 hours ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(407)
-
►
April
(29)
- We're moving home
- They keep on charging
- I have not forgotten
- Après le Dellers
- Cameron gets tough
- One of those days
- An all-time low
- This tells us precisely what?
- Why the cover-up?
- Water thieves
- Not only Greece
- An invite to the discussion?
- A dignified end
- We're not asking
- Thieves out to play
- Looters still at large
- A constitutional democracy
- Happy days
- Holding on to Boris
- Big European Brother
- A real veto
- We're sick of the lot of you
- A non-event
- Dismally led
- The burdenless burden
- The end of the Muppet show?
- A complete coincidence?
- Out to play
- Skulking in the shadows
-
►
March
(109)
- Framing the argument
- Clever old Sun
- A jolly good thing?
- Muddying the waters
- The not-so-free market
- A real rebellion
- By-bye election
- We've been busy
- Nuke plans scrapped
- Hold the front page
- The illusion of choice
- Schools 'n' hospitals reprise
- Dying the death
- The trivia rolls on
- Muddling through is awfully jolly
- Making a mockery of themselves
- The elephant in the letter box
- The Old Swan Manifesto
- A huge political mistake
- You don't say
- Why is this news?
-
►
April
(29)
-
▼
2007
(1691)
-
▼
January
(146)
- A debate in the House
- Attack mode
- A collective failure
- Genocide one or genocide two?
- They really don't get it
- Cut-price Yanks
- The Tuesday "toy"
- A matter of strategic importance
- It's all Bush's fault … again
- An inseparable part of European integration
- A different kind of spin
- Cash for Kim - the story continues
- The wreck of the party
- Hurrah - they're all at it
- Of course, we believe in free speech but ...
- Another fine mess
- The Monday "toy"
- As good as it gets
- "I know who my comrades are"
- A significant action
- Living on the edge
- The Sunday "toy"
- Cooking the books
- On the ball
- More on the UKIP peers
- Flawed priorities
- An unimportant announcement
- A mixed-up bunny
- The Saturday "toy"
- Message received and understood
- Civil war? What civil war?
- Commitment to the battle
- That elusive national identity
- Writing themselves out of the script
- They are really serious
- Not good enough
- Are they mad?
- Naked streets
- Whom is one to believe?
- The wilderness is getting rather crowded
- The last hurrah?
- Helping the Presidency
- And now it's official
- A glimmer of hope
- This is the state we're in
- A photographic feast
- Leaving it to the amateurs
- For God's sake!
- An heroic failure
- What do they hope to achieve?
- The carnage continues
- Missing the story
- Hillary for president?
- Misplaced priorities
- Facts are optional
- Cash for Kim
- Now will they do something?
- One to watch
- Of course, we are in favour of democracy ...
- Repellent, crass and trivial
- Unnecessary risks
- Chancellor Merkel speaks (again)
- First one
- Halutz goes
- A tragic anniversary
- C'est magnifique…
- Never fails to impress
- Not particularly civil and not much of a service
- A seriously unimportant story
- Action and dereliction
- A great service
- Idle talk
- How the mighty have fallen
- The mummification of politics
- I'm a Tory… discuss
- And so to Gerald...
- Battle of the giants
- One small cheer
- Geoffrey Van Orden
- A fatal arrogance
- On the ball?
- Every little bit helps
- Two more die
- An autistic response
- The shadow minister responds
- FOUR!
- Engrenage in action
- More than private grief
- The NFU in its usual form
- Filling the vacuum
- Terror warmers
- How is the new boy doing?
- Could the Iraqi MOI be winding up AP?
- It never rains but it pours
- Mote and beam
- Both can't be wrong
- A done deal?
- Tax banditry?
- Keeping up with the AP story
- The "spin" machine
- Well, it's only money
- Liam Fox pontificates
- Another own goal
- Intruding on private grief
- Neither here nor there
- They have finally done it
- Before and after
- Something to be pleased about
- More like an essential
- Our caring, sharing MoD
- Pass the smelling salts
- The "inner tosser" rides again
- Independence Brown
- It's a crock…
- There is always a silver lining
- The strange case of the "red priest"
- Doing a Harding!
- Not on the agenda
- It's a complicated life
- Doomed, I tell you, doomed
- Daily irritations
- Not good enough
- We have a problem
- Small blackmail - not many interested
- Predictable or what?
- Grown-up politics
- Know how he feels
- Something you never thought you would see
- A single European wife beater?
- Piddling while Rovers burn
- The girlie boys
- I suppose this makes sense to someone
- The fifth currency in sixty years
- Cautiously optimistic?
- Oh no, not food labelling again
- "The international community must do something"
- This blog can reveal...
- Now there's a surprise
- What kind of EU are we going to have?
- The myth and the reality
- Where did you get that hat?
- Post-modernist politics
- No apologies
- Airy promises
- No land, no hope, no glory
- COMMENT THREAD
-
▼
January
(146)
Showing posts with label devolution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label devolution. Show all posts
flags+galore[i-flags+galore]
Today's the day, three hundred years ago, that the Scottish parliament ratified an Act of Union which led, on 1 May 1707, to the formal establishment of the United Kingdom of Great Britain.
It was actually no big deal as the two countries of England and Scotland had shared a king ever since 1603 when, with the death of Queen Elizabeth I, James VI, King of Scots, became King of England. Some will say that we have been subject to Scottish misrule, on and off, ever since and are about to undergo another period.
Nevertheless, the Great Britain established as a legal entity in 1707 actually ceased to be in 1801 when it was superseded by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, brought about by the Act of Union of 1800 which had been enacted after the suppression of the Irish Rebellion in 1798.
That then changed again in 1922 with the grant of independence for the Republic of Ireland, after the partition of six of the nine counties of Ulster. These remained in the UK, formalised by the Anglo-Irish Treaty of 6 December 1921, although the current title of the UK – the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland – was not officially adopted until 1927.
But, if the 1707 Act of Union is now being celebrated so loudly by the chattering classes, it is perhaps only because – after 300 years – the Union itself is supposedly under threat, as politicians north of the border seek a return of an "independence" that had not actually existed for a hundred years before that.
The mutterings across the border – and the limited devolution settlement introduced by the Scotland Act of 1998, which reintroduced a separate Scottish parliament and which have created no end of inconsistencies in England, not least the so-called "Lothian Question" - have led to calls for a similar parliament in England. And so, the chattering classes launch into yet another debate, with the great sheeple following.
What, of course no one mentions is that other great act of union which, coincidentally, has its fiftieth anniversary this year. That was the Treaty of Rome, creating a European Economic Community, a proto-European state. This we joined in 1973, with our own act of union, the European Communities Act 1972, which effectively signed away our independence.
That, in the view of many, including this blog, renders nugatory any discussion about devolution and separate parliaments in England, Wales and Scotland – and Northern Ireland when and if they can get their act together. As long as the bulk of our law is made in Brussels (and Strasbourg) it matters little whether we have additional talking shops in the provinces of a greater European Union.
And, if one is genuinely interested in devolution, then the power needs not to be devolved to Edinburgh, Cardiff and an English parliament, presumably in London. From here, 200 miles from the capital, we have no more love for London on some issues than we do Brussels. Genuine devolution would be the return of powers to local authorities, the central government acting more properly as a supervisor and guarantor of fair play than as ruler and administrator.
But, as long as we suffer the long shadow of Brussels, this all remains idle talk. What is so remarkable though is the willingness, apparently, of some Scots nats, to accept the yoke of Brussels while rejecting the rule of London. That is not so much idle, as mad.
COMMENT THREAD