Donate...
[i-link]
Our Manifesto
Our manifesto
Who governs Britain?
EU Documents
The Lisbon Treaty
That "mandate" analysed
EU Constitution - official version
Constitution analysis
Constitution Summit analysis
Building a political Europe
Myths
The seven basic myths
Good for the environment
Co-operating nation states
Europe reunited
The EU is democratic I
The EU is democratic II
Can't be a "superstate"
Keeping the peace in Europe
A free trade area?
Constitution for enlargement?
Qanagate
Corruption of the Media
click here for contents[i-click here for contents]
Blogroll
-
21 minutes ago
-
32 minutes ago
-
37 minutes ago
-
43 minutes ago
-
59 minutes ago
-
1 hour ago
-
1 hour ago
-
1 hour ago
-
2 hours ago
-
2 hours ago
-
3 hours ago
-
3 hours ago
-
3 hours ago
-
4 hours ago
-
4 hours ago
-
4 hours ago
-
5 hours ago
-
6 hours ago
-
6 hours ago
-
8 hours ago
-
10 hours ago
-
14 hours ago
-
16 hours ago
-
22 hours ago
-
22 hours ago
-
23 hours ago
-
23 hours ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
4 days ago
-
5 days ago
-
5 days ago
-
6 days ago
-
6 days ago
-
6 days ago
-
6 days ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
2 weeks ago
-
2 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
4 weeks ago
-
5 weeks ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
3 months ago
-
4 months ago
-
5 months ago
-
5 months ago
-
-
Climate Change
-
33 minutes ago
-
1 hour ago
-
2 hours ago
-
4 hours ago
-
6 hours ago
-
8 hours ago
-
17 hours ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(407)
-
►
April
(29)
- We're moving home
- They keep on charging
- I have not forgotten
- Après le Dellers
- Cameron gets tough
- One of those days
- An all-time low
- This tells us precisely what?
- Why the cover-up?
- Water thieves
- Not only Greece
- An invite to the discussion?
- A dignified end
- We're not asking
- Thieves out to play
- Looters still at large
- A constitutional democracy
- Happy days
- Holding on to Boris
- Big European Brother
- A real veto
- We're sick of the lot of you
- A non-event
- Dismally led
- The burdenless burden
- The end of the Muppet show?
- A complete coincidence?
- Out to play
- Skulking in the shadows
-
►
March
(109)
- Framing the argument
- Clever old Sun
- A jolly good thing?
- Muddying the waters
- The not-so-free market
- A real rebellion
- By-bye election
- We've been busy
- Nuke plans scrapped
- Hold the front page
- The illusion of choice
- Schools 'n' hospitals reprise
- Dying the death
- The trivia rolls on
- Muddling through is awfully jolly
- Making a mockery of themselves
- The elephant in the letter box
- The Old Swan Manifesto
- A huge political mistake
- You don't say
- Why is this news?
-
►
April
(29)
-
▼
2009
(1557)
-
▼
September
(116)
- Snow job
- Siren voices
- Calculations
- Entertainment value
- Bought and paid for
- Ought I be flattered?
- There was a time ...
- Why?
- Conflicting concerns
- Climate illiteracy
- Wind-kill
- Behind the curve
- Commission breaks European law - shock!
- Germany, elections and that treaty
- Descent into madness
- Ooooo ... er!
- Garbled in transmission?
- A nation of yes-men?
- Time for a rant
- The narrative prevails
- Stop pretending
- Is nothing sacred?
- Watchdog of the watchdog
- The naming of names
- Yellow journalism
- Carbon chaos
- A deadly delay
- One might have thought ...
- Good point - sort of
- One step closer
- Leaving it a bit late
- The problem is not the tool
- A mission statement
- Moral infantilism
- They are not all bad
- Political games
- Dealing with the stink
- Having it both ways
- The office has spoken
- Coprophagia watch #2
- Missing the point
- Consequences
- Coming together
- Sending a signal?
- Coprophagia watch
- Brussels fiddles while home yearns
- Double standards?
- They should have kept quiet
- Memo No 5,673
- The public is bored
- The values of the harlot
- It happened
- An "exciting journey"
- Intelligent debate
- Economy drive
- Democracy in action
- Up his own passage
- More news from up north
- An amalgam of ignorant drivel
- In the melting pot
- All at sea?
- There is no alternative
- Subject to some malfunction
- Still true after all these years
- The antidote
- They know nothing ... they learn nothing
- Turd Watch
- The pictures tell the story
- The turd eaters
- The bigger picture
- A triumph for propaganda
- On not playing nicely with other children
- Silence not an option
- Rising from the dead
- You can fool most of the people ...
- It's all over bar the shouting
- Nice thoughts
- Staying with it
- Getting to the truth
- The EU commission stirs
- For the record
- Nice spot!
- EU tax
- Barking
- And then?
- Yon is wrong
- God help us!
- Well I never!
- The expert speaks
- The EU squeaks
- A grasp of economics
- Go away ...
- A "plot" exposed
- Proud of ourselves?
- Why we're getting it wrong
- Hacking our money
- Brown on Afghanistan
- Handing down the poison chalice
- War porn
- Hollow power?
- Rats and sinking ships
- That dash for gas
- The government can
- The same old mistakes
- Hard times?
- Those power cuts
- Another "perestroika" think-tank
- We thought of it first
- Stop fighting wars!
- Well, it's up
- Round and round
- When means now
- This is a tricky problem
- Germany calling
- Behind the curve
- Progress of a kind
-
▼
September
(116)
Showing posts with label The Sun. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Sun. Show all posts
suncover2[i-suncover2]The real story of the Labour years is one of under-achievement, rank failure and a vast expansion of wasteful government interference in everyone's lives. So says The Sun which, at the tail end of the Labour party conference, has ostentatiously switched sides and is now supporting the Conservatives.
Labour, in the persona of Lord Mandelson, has been quick to respond. He says: "The proprietor might have changed his mind but I don't think the readers want The Sun to set on New Labour. The last thing Sun readers want is to see their newspaper turned into a Tory fanzine. They want a newspaper, not a propaganda sheet."
One cannot resist the temptation of remarking that, if the readers wanted a newspaper, they wouldn't be buying The Sun. But then, given what is generally on offer, they would have trouble buying anything which conformed with that description.
One wonders, though, quite how much traction a tabloid rag of the nature of The Sun really has. Rather than leading opinion, as it would have us believe, the paper is more likely simply following the herd sentiment. Sensing change in the wind – which is not exactly a stunning feat – it has nailed its colours to what it perceives to be the winner's mast. This is indeed followership rather than leadership.
No one, however, will be at all deceived into thinking that The Sun's change of heart is anything to do with a new-found yearning for good government, truth, justice, apple pie and free beer on Sundays. Mandelson puts his finger on the proximate cause for the change – Mr Rupert Murdoch, the proprietor of The Sun and owner of the loss-making News International group.
With his larger business empire reputed to have lost £2 billion last year and with reports of his flagship newspaper, The Times, losing £2 million a week, Murdoch is locked in battle with the BBC over plans to charge for online web content, plans which are jeopardised by the BBC's torrent of "free" content on its taxpayer-funded websites.
No doubt, by allying himself to what appears to be the winning side, Murdoch hopes that vague Conservative ideas on curtailing the ambitions of the BBC might firm up, to his own financial advantage – with the aid of one or two Faustian deals done in the remote corners of smoke-free rooms.
Therefore, what The Sun thinks or says about which party should form our new administration should be irrelevant. What is not irrelevant is that a rich and powerful man can use his products in an attempt to shape public opinion, to his own financial advantage.
However, while his intervention might have an effect, what is going to happen would have probably happened anyway. Most people will make up their own minds. For those people, The Sun's endorsement offers a certain entertainment value, but very little else. For the rest, those who allow their opinions to be shaped by The Sun deserve exactly what they get. The pity of it is that the rest of us do not.
COMMENT THREAD