EU Referendum

Showing posts with label Javier Solana. Show all posts

Both the International Herald Tribune and the Pakistani Daily Times report that Javier Solana, the EU’s Lord High Executioner of Common Foreign Policy, made a statement about the fighting around and inside the Red Mosque in Pakistan.

It seems that Señor Solana is disturbed by what has been going on, as Pakistan is rather an important country and what happens there may well affect developments in Afghanistan. This is undoubtedly true but are we to understand that the EU through its designated spokesman is merely disturbed by the fighting, which just sort of happened?

It would seem so:

"The EU position is that we are gravely concerned because Pakistan is an important country," Solana said after talks with U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

"Also, because the frontier between Afghanistan and Pakistan is fundamental for peacekeeping operations in Afghanistan, where many European countries have deployed troops," Solana said.

Right. We are not taking sides. That would be value-free.

The Australians are taking a somewhat more robust view:

Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downs said his country is concerned with extremism in Pakistan but backs President Musharraf’s efforts to overcome the menace.

Well, I am glad we have moved beyond that old-fashioned, valueless foreign policy.

COMMENT THREAD

Bronze+Soldier_new[i-Bronze+Soldier_new]Could the story of the Bronze soldier and his peregrinations together with the Russian deliberate over-reaction be coming to an end? One can but hope, though, if past history is anything to go by, President Putin or his ministers will find some other excuse to try to stir up trouble in the former Soviet republics.

Both the BBC Russian Service and RIA News have reported that the statue would be open to visitors today in its new place. The latter is ahead of the Beeb with a photograph (it looks real) of the Bronze Soldier in the new position though the wall has not been reconstructed behind him. The official opening will be on May 8, VE Day or the eve of Victory Day, depending on where you are.

Meanwhile, the accusations have started flying back and forth. The Estonian Foreign Ministry has accused the Russian government of deliberately fomenting the protests in Tallinn and Narva and has protested against the continuing picketing of the Estonian embassy in Moscow, in the process preventing the Estonian ambassador from leaving the building.

The same news item on the BBC website tells us that the coffins of 12 Soviet soldiers have been found near to where the memorial had stood until this Friday.

Meanwhile the Russian parliamentary delegation has arrived in Tallinn. According to the Estonians discussions will centre around the scores of Russian citizens who were arrested during the riots and the one Russian citizen who has died of knife wounds.

The delegation seems to have a different view:

The Russians will call on Estonian Prime Minister Andrus Ansip to resign, delegation chief Nikolai Kovalyov told the Baltic News Service before leaving Moscow.

They also want the statue of the Bronze soldier at the centre of the row to be returned to the central Tallinn site from where it was removed last week, he added.

Since neither of these things are likely to happen, they might as well discuss what to do about the various Russians from Russia.

The EU has finally noticed that something is going on around its eastern border. Chancellor Merkel has spoken to President Putin about the Estonian problem among other matters and Ilkka Kanerva, the Finnish Foreign Minister has called for the maintenance of a joint line on the subject. Of course, that begs the question of what that joint line might be and, it would appear, that the attitude of the new intake, especially the Baltic States and Finland could be somewhat different from that of other member states. But that’s just attitude.

When it comes to the joint line, it seems to consist of a general agreement that this is a bilateral problem (aren’t they all?) and the EU need not interfere. So much for a common foreign policy though the German Foreign Minister is desperately warning about a renewed Cold War. Given what has been going on in the last few weeks and months, the words horses, bolting and stable doors spring to mind.

The oddest reaction came from Javier Solana, though this seems to have been reported only by RIA:

The EU's leading foreign policy and security official said Saturday he was concerned by the use of force against protesters following the removal of a WWII statue in Tallinn Friday.

In a telephone conversation with Estonian President Toomas Hendrik, EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy Javier Solana urged Estonia to avoid violence and defuse tensions, Solana's press secretary said.

Apparently, Solana confirmed that he did not think this was an EU issue but a bilateral one between Estonia and Russia (just as he thought Poland’s problems with Russia were no concern of his). The question is why Solana? If the story is true he was commenting on something that is not part of his portfolio. He deals with the EU’s foreign policy while the behaviour of the Estonian police is internal EU policy.

Is Solana making noises because this is, after all, a matter for the Common Foreign Policy Supremo, there being the problem of Russia interfering with the internal matters of an EU member state? If so, why not say so? Or, perhaps, he did but RIA did not report it. Then again, no-one else seems to have reported him either.

COMMENT THREAD

javier_solana[i-javier_solana]A few days ago AP reported that Javier Solana was criticizing the United States for building a fence along its border with Mexico in order to control illegal immigration. What it has to do with Solana is anybody’s guess and, unsurprisingly, at least one blogger was somewhat unhappy.

Of course, neither he nor the people who commented on the blog know what the EU’s own policy on immigrants is. Otherwise they might have found the following, how shall I put it, a little hypocritical:

"A wall that separates one country from another is not something that I like or that the European Union members like," Solana said at a news conference in Mexico City. "We don't think walls are reasonable instruments to stop people from crossing into a country."

The EU believes immigrants should be treated "like people, not like criminals," he said.

Oh really? So, ahem, what is Frontex with its rapidly accumulating military power all about? Allow me to remind our readers what the Director of Frontex said:

We can only be happy having assets from 21 Members State, among them 21 fixed wing aircrafts (sic), 27 helicopters, 116 vessels, mobile radar units and other special technical equipment. Of course we will welcome warmly any new assets…

Nor should we forget the planned force of 450 rapidly deployable border guards that will be able (theoretically) to rush to the aid of any country that is having problems with immigrants.

Presumably, all this is needed simply in order to invite the illegal immigrants to a tea party.

It seems that Javier Solana managed to forget about several things. Frontex, of course, but also the agonizing discussion of the porous Spanish border and the various camps for immigrants created by the Spanish government with EU approval in it enclaves in North Africa. (Maybe that is what they want Gibraltar for.) We have covered the story recently here and here, mentioning the curiously inhuman approach by the EU to potential immigrants (as well as the policies that lead directly to this problem).

In fact, now that I think of it, we have written a great deal of the way the EU treats the poorer countries and the immigrants from them. What is the Spanish for motes and beams?

COMMENT THREAD