Donate...
[i-link]
Our Manifesto
Our manifesto
Who governs Britain?
EU Documents
The Lisbon Treaty
That "mandate" analysed
EU Constitution - official version
Constitution analysis
Constitution Summit analysis
Building a political Europe
Myths
The seven basic myths
Good for the environment
Co-operating nation states
Europe reunited
The EU is democratic I
The EU is democratic II
Can't be a "superstate"
Keeping the peace in Europe
A free trade area?
Constitution for enlargement?
Qanagate
Corruption of the Media
click here for contents[i-click here for contents]
Blogroll
-
24 minutes ago
-
31 minutes ago
-
31 minutes ago
-
51 minutes ago
-
1 hour ago
-
1 hour ago
-
1 hour ago
-
2 hours ago
-
2 hours ago
-
2 hours ago
-
3 hours ago
-
3 hours ago
-
3 hours ago
-
4 hours ago
-
6 hours ago
-
6 hours ago
-
7 hours ago
-
8 hours ago
-
10 hours ago
-
12 hours ago
-
14 hours ago
-
20 hours ago
-
20 hours ago
-
20 hours ago
-
21 hours ago
-
21 hours ago
-
21 hours ago
-
22 hours ago
-
23 hours ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
2 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
3 days ago
-
4 days ago
-
5 days ago
-
5 days ago
-
6 days ago
-
6 days ago
-
6 days ago
-
6 days ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
1 week ago
-
2 weeks ago
-
2 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
3 weeks ago
-
4 weeks ago
-
5 weeks ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
1 month ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
2 months ago
-
3 months ago
-
4 months ago
-
5 months ago
-
5 months ago
-
-
Climate Change
-
1 hour ago
-
1 hour ago
-
4 hours ago
-
6 hours ago
-
9 hours ago
-
12 hours ago
-
14 hours ago
-
1 day ago
-
1 day ago
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(407)
-
►
April
(29)
- We're moving home
- They keep on charging
- I have not forgotten
- Après le Dellers
- Cameron gets tough
- One of those days
- An all-time low
- This tells us precisely what?
- Why the cover-up?
- Water thieves
- Not only Greece
- An invite to the discussion?
- A dignified end
- We're not asking
- Thieves out to play
- Looters still at large
- A constitutional democracy
- Happy days
- Holding on to Boris
- Big European Brother
- A real veto
- We're sick of the lot of you
- A non-event
- Dismally led
- The burdenless burden
- The end of the Muppet show?
- A complete coincidence?
- Out to play
- Skulking in the shadows
-
►
March
(109)
- Framing the argument
- Clever old Sun
- A jolly good thing?
- Muddying the waters
- The not-so-free market
- A real rebellion
- By-bye election
- We've been busy
- Nuke plans scrapped
- Hold the front page
- The illusion of choice
- Schools 'n' hospitals reprise
- Dying the death
- The trivia rolls on
- Muddling through is awfully jolly
- Making a mockery of themselves
- The elephant in the letter box
- The Old Swan Manifesto
- A huge political mistake
- You don't say
- Why is this news?
-
►
April
(29)
-
▼
2010
(1372)
-
▼
March
(107)
- Good news for polar bears
- Some progress on nukes
- The land of perpetual crisis
- Global warming
- The universal politician
- It was never going to be any different
- How government corrupts science
- Apples and oranges
- Perpetual motion
- Exactly right
- Absolutely tickety-boo*
- A choice
- Dishonesty multiplied
- Huge parallels
- "We will not prevail in Afghanistan"
- A thoroughly dishonest letter
- Like rabbits in headlights
- Is this what politics has come to?
- No discernible difference
- Germany cooling!
- An international epidemic
- Environmentalism has been hijacked by the warmists...
- Green waste
- A co-ordinated counter-offensive
- The US goes down the European road
- A new blog on the block
- Slowly deflating
- A masterpiece
- The long goodbye
- Perhaps they really are that ignorant
- Times Higher Education
- Death by press release
- The group-think with no clothes
- The unsustainable BBC
- It's the energy stoopid!
- The death of real politics
- Losing the battle?
- An addition to the vocabulary
- Can he be that stupid?
- Bloweth the wind
- They've been on a rampage
- A condition of membership
- Distorted priorities
- The cold wind doth blow
- Ads by Google
- Amazongate II - Seeing REDD
- Rage ascendant
- Somebody has to be wrong
- Doomed
- Mistake or mistakes?
- What energy crisis?
- Increasingly out of touch
- Meanie greenies
- Bricks in the wall
- Big profits in climate hysteria
- Better in French
- Debating the real issues
- The day comes closer
- An era of plenty?
- The face of reason
- Sly, dishonest gradualism
- The world we live in
- Amazon drought: the least of their worries
- Booker on bird choppers
- The biggest mistake yet
- Repeat after me
- Party political games
- Honey! I've shrunk the birdies!
- The end is nigh!
- Germany warning
- Is climate change losing us the war in Afghanistan...
- A carbon neutral blog?
- The hidden hand
- The sinister nexus
- You can't buck the narrative
- It's started
- A multiple of insanity
- They are serious
- Not over by Christmas
- Jobs for the boys (and girls)
- Neck and neck in the marginals
- Who owns the science?
- It is a religion!
- The great scam exposed
- Lean times for the alarmists
- No answers in the soil
- Real politics
- Big "Climate" Brother
- The dance of the seven veils
- The awakening
- Farting cows online
- The ice floes of reality
- They just don't get it
- Five times the cost of the Manhattan Project
- Only another million
- What sort of country is this?
- Bird choppers
- Making friends
- What is the point?
- Falling stars
- Climate parasites
- A third rate government
- The system is broke
- Consequences
- A face of evil
- A state of fear (not)
- Keep the camp fires burning
-
▼
March
(107)
Showing posts with label Greenpeace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Greenpeace. Show all posts
Naidoo[i-Naidoo]This is Kumi Naidoo, described as the head of Greenpeace. He – or so we are told – argues that it is justifiable to break the law in order to alert people to the threat of climate change.
He is speaking in defence of his activists, 54 of whom have been charged with trespass after spending the night on the roof of the Houses of Parliament in October last year, and says his organisation has no intention of scaling back its tactics.
Actually, I have no problem with the idea of breaking (mad-made) laws. The concept of civil disobedience is honourable and well-established. Much of the progress in what passes for civilisation has been made by men and women of principle refusing to be bound by outdated or unjust laws. And I have personally broken too many such laws in my time to be able to sit on my high horse and condemn anyone else for doing what they believe to be right.
However, there is a distinct and unwholesome tinge to Mr Naidoo's brand of civil disobedience. In the general run of things, the tactic is normally employed by individuals or groups who believe their rights are being infringed or that they are being oppressed by the state. In Mr Naidoo's case, he is seeking to impose his belief system on the rest of humanity, enlisting the state in his cause, to impose expensive and oppressive measures on us all.
Thus, if Mr Naidoo believes that breaking the law is justifiable – as a matter of principle - in pursuit of his beliefs, he can have no reasonable objection if those who wholeheartedly disagree with him adopt exactly the same tactic, in opposition to him and his followers.
And if down that slippery slope we must all travel, he must not be surprised if civil disobedience then extends to refusing to obey any laws that are passed as a result of his activism. "It's only when decent men and women are willing to stand up, put their lives on the line and take strong, vibrant action that the agenda can move forward," he says.
Quite.
CLIMATE CHANGE – END GAME